Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Holistic Medicines To Treat Cancer


What is cancer?

Cancer is a group of diseases characterized by the growth of abnormal cells that divide uncontrollably and destroy body tissues. Cancer can spread throughout the body. Sometimes, however, normal cells lose their ability to control and limit growth. They divide and grow without order and format of too many cells, which we call cancer.

There is an epidemic of cancer?

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Half of all men and one third of all women in the United States will develop cancer during their lifetime. Today, millions of people living with cancer or at risk of developing the disease. The increased incidence of cancer is a major concern for all those who reviewed the statistics. For example, in 1996, more Americans died of cancer who died in World War II, the Korean War and Vietnam, with 550,000 Americans die of cancer. In 2002, 1.25 million Americans were diagnosed with cancer. One person dies of cancer every minute. Cancer has become a worldwide pandemic, regardless of the treatment of conventional propaganda machine continues to tell us, the "war on cancer" by the medical profession and drug manufacturers is undoubtedly is disappearing.

United States, billions of dollars have been spent on cancer research and the result was just frustrated and a sharp increase in deaths from cancer and conventional treatments for cancer that is difficult to achieve, toxic and very unpleasant. This increase in cancer incidence was 1% each year, which means that the incidence of cancer in the world population has increased by 40% since 1955!

What are the conventional treatments?

Un grand nombre d'or Extraits naturels de plantes et de supplements, Tels que ceux des beta-glucanes polysacharrides contenant d'autres et à longue chaîne, the Remède Lauriers-roses que j'ai écrit sur, Colloidal Silver, Inositol ( IP-6), the ABM mushroom, l'Afrique du Sud "Cancer Bush" Sutherlandia frutescans, label de chat, Pau d'Arco, mushrooms corialus versicolor, et beaucoup d'autres ont à améliorer the Civil Service Prouvé immunity, détruire les agents pathogènes, de proteger nos cellules, et le cancer Overcome.

In the U.S. there are three legal ways to treat cancer surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In other words, they either cut the cancer, burn or poison. Conventional medicine is very rigid in its control of how cancer treatment. It looks pretty gross, but unfortunately, the only approved conventional cancer treatments!

It 's a pity that, although the multi-billion conventional cancer treatment has made substantial improvements in cancer treatment in recent decades.


Check Out LassBoat For Great Content And Awesome Deals: LassBoat Content By Women For Women

What alternative medicine holistic?

Cancerous tumors can spread quickly and threaten life, therefore the treatment used against this disease must also be powerful powerful. The methods must be safe for the patient, but effective in killing cancer cells. Using the conventional treatment is rarely possible to limit the effects of cancer treatment so that only cancer cells are destroyed. Normal, healthy cells are usually damaged at the same time. For this reason, cancer patients receiving conventional treatments have to suffer through a variety of unpleasant and often painful side effects. The fact is that these traditional methods are not effective for treating cancer in the long term. So people more and more people are turning to other, natural responses to this global health problem. Some of the therapies used to treat cancer effectively are:

Zeolite

It is a mineral with potent ability to kill cancer cells within days! They are powerful detoxifying and improve the alkalinity of the body and activate the P21 gene which tells a cancer cell to die, and that can literally destroy the nucleus of cancer cells. Liquid zeolite is a need for detoxification.

Oxygen:

Oxygen Therapy form of holistic therapy based on the premise that all harmful bacteria, viruses, bacteria and fungi (eg, flu, fever, AIDS, Candida albicans and cancer cells) are anaerobic. In other words, they can not survive in high oxygen environments. Thus, to maintain good health and vitality of the human body needs plenty of oxygen. This treatment is based on the work of Dr. Otto Warburg, twice Nobel Prize.

Bio magnetic therapy:

Bio-Magnetic therapy is simple, natural and its application similar to acupuncture. He brought health benefits for people worldwide. Today there is renewed interest in the use of magnets for pain control. Some holistic practitioners believe that magnetic energy can help relieve the polarity of the cancer cell and can induce the differentiation of the cell would not cancerous.


Check Out LassBoat For Great Content And Awesome Deals: LassBoat Content By Women For Women

Nutritional therapy

Nutrition Therapy is a holistic medicine, use of food, juices and supplements to promote natural healing of the body. It does this by: detoxify the body, correcting nutritional deficiencies, create a proper pH level and develop a positive mental attitude. There are thousands of research articles, which clearly indicate a lack of nutrients in the presence of cancer. Therefore, the optimal intake of nutrients can help reverse the cancer. Some nutritional studies have shown that support the fight against cancer and other degenerative diseases are vitamins A, C, D and E, bioflavonoids, and Co Q-10. Other reports indicate a large benefit from the use of selenium, germanium and other trace elements of cancer control.

Ris treatment: thymus, a gland in the chest, which narrows as we age, has been recognized as the seat of the immune system. Thymus produces different hormone-like substances that affect the growth and maturation of T cells that are crucial for defending the body against cancer and AIDS. Whole thymus extracts and a number of specific plant extracts such as thymosin and thymopoietin, has been used to build the immune system to an incredible degree to defend ourselves against cancer and assist in the treatment of almost any disease.

These treatments are used in a hospital in Mexico, who has held a variety of cancer treatments for two decades one of the world's largest cancer the lowest.

In the first case, the oncologist decided to test the patient at what stage the cancer has spread to the point of departure. There are usually four cancer. When the oncologist at the cancer is found, may be using an approved treatment, especially cancer.



Modern Medicine Versus Nature in Treating Cancer


Western medicine, a difference of at least 6000 years of practicing natural medicine treats the body as a collection of pieces rather than a synergistic organism. As regards the treatment of broken bones and injured body parts, conventional Western medicine is unequaled. When this same approach is used to treat illness and disease - fixing or repairing the parts where the symptoms of underlying illnesses manifest themselves, modern medicine fails miserably.

In the case of cancer, rather than addressing the causes of cancer - toxins and a weakened immune system - we see instead treatments that either slash, burn or poison away the tumors and cancer cells, further weakening a cancer immune system has already defeated and that aggravate the conditions that led to cancer to begin.

Although initially successful in getting rid of cancer cells and the existing tumors, the end result is a weakened body which may have major organ damage and are more susceptible to the resurgence of the original tumor and other cancers and diseases.

For half a century or more, we were told that a discovery or a cure for cancer is just around the corner, but death rates for cancer remain virtually unchanged. Meanwhile, effective natural and alternative treatments which address and correct the root causes of cancer continue to enjoy much more success than traditional treatments largely failed - even when these natural alternatives are suppressed and increasingly challenged by the medical profession .

Profit plays an important role in Western medicine and, because nature can not be patented, there is no benefit in conducting studies on natural remedies for cancer and disease. In fact, if studies were to test the effectiveness of natural alternatives and the alternatives should be approved for use in the treatment of cancer and other diseases, the result would allow cheaper, safer and more effective competition in a heavily guarded. Instead, these solutions are strongly suppressed, discredited and passed by "snake oil" and "voodoo medicine."

The cold, hard reality is that cancer and other chronic degenerative diseases and is a big deal - on the order of several hundred billion dollars a year. When their only market our bodies, the special interests of the trillion-dollar global empire pharmaceutical, traditional medicine and the institutions that are dependent on maintaining the status quo is unlikely to allow such natural competition, even if the cost of millions of unnecessary deaths and untold suffering.


Check Out LassBoat For Great Content : LassBoat Content By Women For Women

A better plan to maintain and increase profits is to continue to provide new drugs to market, which treat only symptoms and severe side effects that lead to even more drugs in an endless cycle, so when a male U.S. after 65 years of age, it takes an average of 15 prescription and nonprescription drugs every day - where it all began with one or two facts that could be treated safely and effectively by natural means. A good model for profit, but horrible for humanity.

We now have over 15,000 patented and approved drugs, 95% have significant side effects. It is no accident that our doctors have learned for generations, as we have been the way to treat illness and disease is to prescribe approved medications - drugs that are manufactured from the highest contributor away to fund medical education: the world pharmaceutical companies. What exactly has this mountain of medical cures in the past half-century? Certainly not cancer!

By far the most effective way to combat and prevent cancer is to remove the causes of cancer and make your body as inhospitable to cancer and disease as possible. To understand the steps we can and must take, we need to understand what we know about cancer:

We know that:

o The development of cancer indicates that our natural defense line first, our immune system has been defeated and that the presence of any of the toxins and pathogens, or some imbalance in our body have led to the appearance and allowed him to acquire cancer .

No cancer can not develop without the liver.

o Cancer can not survive in an alkaline environment, it can not survive in a highly oxygenated environment.

o detoxification and cleansing of our settlers and the liver helps restore balance, prepares our body to better utilize natural immune boosters and cancer fighters and paves the way to rebuilding our livers and immune systems.

No Cancer cells are diseased, impaired and / or attempt to pathogens and have lost the ability to be die naturally by apoptosis of cells, and replacing healthy cells. These cancerous cells simply become abnormal and outlive other cells in their normal cell life / replacement time and possibly move the territory of the time.

or iodine, vitamin D and potassium are essential to combat and prevent cancer.

or fresh air, pure water and sunshine are also vital to maintaining a healthy body that can fight and conquer diseases like cancer.

No natural diet of uncontaminated raw vegetables and raw fruit, rich in omega-3 and the balanced diet was effective in many natural protocols of cancer.

Cancer


word cancer is taken from the word "carb" in Latin, the malignancy. the disease of cancer can be defined as "an abnormal growth of cells which tend to proliferate in an uncontrolled way and, in some cases, to metastasize." Cancer is also known as a malignant tumor, a malignant tumor, and tumors. There are over a hundred diseases and each type of cancer called different cause, and treatment options.

Cancer is a disease of cells that make up the organs and tissues in the body. These cells normally repair and reproduce in an orderly manner. If for any reason this process gets out of control, a growth or tumor type.

Some cancers are:

Bladder cancer: Bladder cancer is a disease in which abnormal cells from a malignant tumor of the bladder. The bladder, the urinary system is the holy body, muscle or balloon located in the pelvis that stores urine until it is normally released. The most common symptoms of bladder cancer is blood in urine or painful urination. Smoking is a risk factor that causes bladder cancer.

Breast cancer: Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women and second leading cause of cancer death. The most common signs of breast cancer is a lump or thickening in the breast. A chunk is an armpit that does not disappear, and therefore may be signs of cancer. Other possible symptoms include breast discharge, nipple inversion, or changes in the skin overlying the breast. Treatment options for treating breast cancer are surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, and.

Lung cancer: Lung cancer is the malignant transformation and growth of lung problem. Lung, a portion of the respiratory system is a pair of sponge-like, the cone-shaped organs in the human body.

There are two types of lung cancer and mesothelioma primary. Each type of lung cancer have different causes occur and are treated differently. Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer occur. Current treatments used to treat lung cancer are surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Leukemia Leukemia is a cancer of the blood-forming tissues such as bone marrow. These crazy, immature cells accumulate in the blood and organs. They are not capable of performing the normal functions of blood cells. The major forms of leukemia are divided into four categories: acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

According to the abnormal cells are the most common symptoms of leukemia include fever, weakness, bleeding gums, frequent infections, weight loss, and etc. There are two forms of leukemia treatment - induction and processing continues. In induction, the primary treatment to reduce the number of leukemic cells and the key is to induce remission. Remission is a period where the cancer is responding to treatment or are under control. The further processing occurs after the patient goes through the process of remission. The main objective of this phase is to kill cancer cells left out.

Colon cancer, colon cancer, also known as colorectal cancer or colon cancer is a disease in which malignant growth of abnormal cells in the colon or rectum and appendix. It begins in the digestive system, called the gastrointestinal tract. It is the third most common form of cancer. The most common symptoms of colon cancer is diarrhea, blood in stool, weight loss, abdominal pain and pain, etc. Treatment options available for the treatment of colon cancer therapy are surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Other forms of cancer, kidney cancer, laryngeal cancer, thyroid cancer, vaginal cancer, melanoma, skin cancer, oral cancer, anal cancer, brain cancer, cancer penis, etc.

Options for Cancer Treatment: There are several treatment options are used to treat each type of cancer, but the most popular type used for cancer treatment are surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, biological therapy, gene therapy, hormone therapy, etc.

Radiation therapy: Radiation therapy is a special type of therapy that uses radiation to kill cancer cells that grow quickly. There are two main types of external beam radiation and internal radiation. External radiation is also known as X-ray therapy, cobalt therapy and proton therapy. In this therapy a beam of radiation is directed from outside the body. Internal radiation therapy is also called brachytherapy or implant therapy, which is surgically implanted a source of radioactivity within the body near the tumor.

Chemotherapy: This treatment is used to describe the medicine to kill cancer cells. This treatment is given to those with advanced cancers that have spread elsewhere in the body, possibly outside the colon.

- Surgery is an operation that involves the removal of a colon cancer. It serves as a primary treatment of cancer.

Pregnancy after breast cancer

Breast cancer survivors of childbearing age appeared considerably less likely than women in the general population to become pregnant, according to study results presented at the virtual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
Survivors who conceived after completing treatment faced elevated risks for certain complications, including preterm birth. However, most survivors who became pregnant had healthy babies, with no increased risk for congenital abnormalities or adverse impact on long-term maternal survival.
Survivors who conceived after completing treatment faced elevated risks for certain complications, including preterm birth.
“After adequate treatment and follow-up, pregnancy after breast cancer should not be discouraged,” Matteo Lambertini, MD, PhD, adjunct professor in medical oncology at University of Genova — IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital in Genova, Italy, told Healio. “These findings are of paramount importance to raise awareness of the need to offer complete oncofertility counseling to all newly diagnosed young [women with breast cancer] in order to increase chances of future conception.”
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women of reproductive age, accounting for approximately 30% of new cancer diagnoses worldwide among those aged younger than 40 years.
The availability of more effective therapies has reduced breast cancer mortality over the past 2 decades. Consequently, there has been increased emphasis on survivorship and the potential long-term toxicities associated with treatment, including effects on fertility.
In addition, given the fact age of first pregnancy is on the rise, an increasing percentage of women are diagnosed with breast cancer prior to having children.
Photo of Matteo Lambertini
Matteo Lambertini
“Returning to a normal life after cancer diagnosis and treatment should be considered in the 21st century as a crucial ambition in cancer care,” Lambertini said. “[For] patients diagnosed during their reproductive years, this includes the possibility to complete their family planning.”
However, only a small number of women diagnosed with breast cancer during their reproductive years conceive following treatment.
Surveys show many women and their physicians have concerns about maternal and fetal safety after breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. These concerns include the potential that anticancer therapies may increase risk for congenital abnormalities or obstetric or birth complications, as well as the possibility that pregnancy may have a detrimental prognostic impact given many breast cancer subtypes are hormonally driven.
Consequently, it is crucial to provide updated evidence to guide women and their physicians during guideline-recommended oncofertility counseling, and to ensure women are not denied opportunities to complete family planning after treatment completion, Lambertini said.
Lambertini and colleagues conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess pregnancy chances after breast cancer, as well as reproductive and disease outcomes, among women who completed breast cancer treatment.
The review encompassed 39 studies that identified women who became pregnant after breast cancer diagnosis. These studies included a combined 8.26 million women, 114,573 of whom had breast cancer and 57,739 of whom had malignancies other than breast cancer. Approximately 6.5% of those with breast cancer (n = 7,505) became pregnant after diagnosis.
Researchers determined breast cancer survivors who completed treatment were 60% less likely than women in the general population to become pregnant (RR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.32-0.49). In the cohort of women who had malignancies other than breast cancer, only those with prior cervical cancer exhibited a lower pregnancy rate than that observed in the breast cancer subgroup (RR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31-0.35).
Breast cancer survivors who did conceive appeared more likely than those in the general population to require caesarean section (OR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25). They also exhibited elevated risks for certain complications, such low birth weight (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.31-1.73), preterm delivery (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88) and having a baby small for gestational age (OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33), although the latter two complications appeared restricted primarily to women who received chemotherapy.
Investigators reported no significant increased risk for congenital abnormalities (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.89-2.98) or other pregnancy or delivery complications, such as gestosis, spontaneous or induced abortion, or postpartum hemorrhage.
Pregnancy after breast cancer did not appear to have a negative effect on maternal outcomes regardless of tumor characteristics, BRCA status, type of prior treatment or timing of pregnancy.
Those who became pregnant after breast cancer achieved longer OS (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.67) and DFS (HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94) than women who did not have a subsequent pregnancy. Studies that corrected for the potential “healthy mother effect” — which suggests women who have good prognoses and feel well are more likely to attempt to conceive — yielded similar results for OS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.65) and DFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96).
When researchers analyzed outcomes based on hormone receptor status, they determined pregnancy after breast cancer had no detrimental prognostic effect for women with hormone receptor-positive disease (HR for DFS = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.73-1.66). They observed better outcomes for those with hormone receptor-negative disease (HR for DFS = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95).
“The higher risk [for] delivery and fetal complications — but not of congenital abnormalities — calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies,” Lambertini told Healio. “The lack of detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after breast cancer following appropriate treatment and follow-up strongly voices for the need for a deeper consideration of patients’ pregnancy desire as a crucial component of their survivorship care plan and wish to return to a normal life.”
The low rate of pregnancy among breast cancer survivors surprised investigators, but there are potential explanations, Lambertini said.
These include older age at diagnosis of breast cancer compared with other malignancies that occurred among women of reproductive age, the need to administer potentially gonadotoxic therapies — including cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimens — and the 5- to 10-year duration of adjuvant endocrine treatment for women with hormone receptor-positive disease, during which pregnancy is contraindicated.
“Therefore, proper and timely referral of patients potentially interested in future conception to fertility units is crucial,” Lambertini told Healio. “Strengthening oncofertility programs and overcoming the barriers for their implementation — including financial burden — should be considered a priority to ultimately improve patients’ care in this setting.”
It also is possible that patients’ and physicians’ concerns that breast cancer diagnosis and treatment could have a negative impact on reproductive outcomes and maternal safety may have discouraged survivors from attempting pregnancy, Lambertini said.
“These highly relevant issues have been now strongly dispelled by the present meta-analysis,” he said.
Lambertini and colleagues acknowledged study limitations, including their inability to examine individual patient data and the fact most studies in their review were retrospective analyses.
In addition, most of the studies included in the analysis did not capture the number of women who tried to become pregnant after completing treatment. The studies that did include this information suggested more than half of women who attempted pregnancy were able to conceive without the need for assisted reproductive technology.
“Another crucial message from these studies is that some patients without pregnancy desire to conceive,” Lambertini said. “This highlights that oncofertility counseling should include not only information on fertility preservation and safety of pregnancy after breast cancer, but also information on adequate and safe contraception at diagnosis, as well as during treatment and follow-up.”

Cancer - We Know the Cause and the Cure


One has to wonder why, after billions of dollars in research and development of cancer treatments have been shown to have a better chance of getting cancer today than did in 1950. Why, indeed, if you are diagnosed with cancer today your chances of survival than they were in 1950, and in many cases, most of it.

Our health care system and our government is lying and misleading the public the effectiveness of conventional medical treatment for cancer. The chemotherapy drugs, surgery and radiotherapy are the most profitable industry in the health services and products on the planet. He has more victories than any other disease of cancer. Most of us have no idea what this is big business. Some families make a profit of billions of dollars each year in the treatment of cancer. When we say it is cancer, what is meant. There is much less useful in treating it. Think about it, if we are cured of cancer now so that the tumor has destroyed the planet billions of dollars would be lost! And treatments are from the government. So those at the top of this economic pyramid, rather than having cancer or not. You are forced to deal with it in a way that makes money for those who benefit from the disease.

And it's true, though, because they are difficult to alternative therapies off the market or is very difficult to give and to choose an alternative method of cancer treatment.

With a bit of the disease if the cause is found, then after treatment. So what is the cause of cancer? Researchers tell us that we do not know the cause. This is simply not true. According to "Natural Cures They Do not Want You To Know About" by Kevin Trudeau, "The causes of cancer are known in the highest levels of the healthcare industry, and this information is suppressed and hidden from U.S. public . This is exactly the same situation that led to snuff out great, and with Ford and General Motors. Tobacco in 1950 knew that their product causes cancer and disease. They lied about it to the American public and even congressional hearings . They hid the truth. Ford and General Motors knew that some of its products, including the Pinto and Corvair, would encourage people to be maimed, deformed, wounded and dying. They hid this information and lied about it.

There are those, like Kevin Trudeaux and Dr. Hulda Clark, who are actively getting the word and help many people.

Dr. Hulda Clark has done extensive research and active treatment of this disease for many years. Below is from The Cure for all cancers that you can buy from [http://www.drclarkuniversity.org]

"The reason

For many years, because we all agree that cancer is different from other diseases. We believed that cancer behaves like a fire, because you can not stop when he started. That's why you need to cut out or radiate to death or chemically destroy the whole body of cancer cells, because it can not become normal. We were wrong!

And we have believed that cancers of different types, such as breast cancer or leukemia have different causes. Wrong again!

In this book you will see that all cancers are similar. All of them are caused by a parasite. A single parasite! It is the human intestinal parasite. And if you kill this parasite, the cancer stops immediately. The tissue becomes normal. For cancer, you must have this parasite.

How cancer of the human intestine cause random? The parasite usually lives in the intestine, where it could do much damage, as colitis, Crohn's disease or irritable bowel syndrome, or perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the uterus or kidneys or liver, it is a great evil. If it settles in the liver, it causes cancer! He established himself as the liver in some people. These people have isopropyl alcohol in their bodies.

All cancer patients have both isopropyl alcohol in their liver and intestinal Fluke. The solvent, isopropyl alcohol, is responsible for leaving the Fluke to assert itself in the liver. In order to get cancer, you must have both the parasite and isopropyl alcohol in the body. "

From the book "The Cure for all cancers." Page 1.

Cancer can be cured now:

From the book The Cure of Cancer: Cancer can not be improved, just treated. We are not accustomed to think of a cure for cancer. We think of remission as possible. But this book is not about remission. This is a cure. This is possible because in 1990 I discovered the real cause of cancer. The cause is a parasite, I found no evidence of a tumor, regardless of the type of cancer. So lung cancer is caused by smoking, colon cancer is not caused by a low roughage diet, breast cancer is not caused by fatty diet, retinal blastoma is not caused by a rare gene, and pancreatic cancer is not caused by alcohol consumption. While these are all contributing factors, does not arise. Once you have found a cure for the real reason became clear. But would it work? Interlock goal of 100 cases of cancer can be improved before the release of my results. This symbol was adopted in December 1992.

The discovery of the cause and cure for all cancers has stood the test, and here it is!

These are contaminants in foodstuffs and other products that leave us vulnerable to pests and diseases. Dr. Clark has invented a device called the Syncro meter, which is used to identify the various toxins in food and related products and ourselves. She also developed a device called the zapper that kills parasites in the body.

The book "The Cure for all diseases." Before the content of Dr. Hulda Clark and is also available or www.drclarkuniversity.org www.drhuldaclark.org.

"You might not have time to read this book first if you have cancer and is scheduled for surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. You can skip the first pages which describe how cancer develops.

Go directly to cure cancer and the recipe for their supplies. Using the herbal recipe and the zapper is best. It takes a few days to cure cancer, regardless of the type you have. No matter how advanced the cancer, you can always finish within 5 days.

Today, pharmaceutical companies and the leaders of these organizations are familiar with the various reasons people come down with cancer. These are empirical data, but they are lies and hide this fact from the public. "

When you are finished with cancer, you can turn your attention to get well. Read the case history to see how easy it is to stop, even cancer. Learn from them to avoid mistakes.

Does that mean you can cancel your date of surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy? YES! After curing your cancer with this recipe, it can not come back. This is not a cure for cancer: It is a cure! But if you do not want your doctor angry, you can follow his wishes, too. Be careful not to lose vital anatomical parts in surgery though, because you may need it later when you're healthy!

Remember that oncologists are kind, sensitive, compassionate people. They want the best for you. They have no way of knowing about the true cause and cure of cancer, because they have not been published. I decided to publish it first, so that would come to your attention faster. "

From the book "The Cure for all diseases." After the cover.

different solvents accumulate in various organs, liver, isopropyl alcohol, which completes the cycle of life Fasciolopsis, intestinal fluke. He began the malignant process.

To book the cure all diseases, also in www.drclarkuniversity.org:

... The killing of all parasites and their larvae with removal of isopropyl alcohol and carcinogens from the results of the patient's lifestyle in remarkable recovery, generally noticeable in less than a week. Cancer can be eradicated within a very short ...

Cancer

Success rate of advanced cancer is about 95%. So you can rely on this method, not only in the hope that it works for you. This is a comprehensive approach not only reduces the tumors, but also normalizes blood chemistry, reduce the signs of cancer and restore health. A small defect rate (5%) due to an emergency clinic, surrounded the advanced cancer patient. However, when combined with the advice of this book to get hospital care, even if the "hopeless" patients can receive the necessary time to become well again.

The promise

Enter a new world a world without chronic diseases. Leave your old world. You keep a prisoner. Try something new.

The prison has no walls. It has only lines, the lines that mark the ground around you. Inside the lines are your old ideas. Apart from the new ideas that invite you to step out of his prison. Dare to try these new ideas and reverse disease. Within weeks, may be gone.

From the book "The Cure for all diseases." Page 1.

I highly recommend one of the books by Dr. Clark. They are remarkable, and when you read them, I believe to be convinced that the cause and cure are now easily accessible and very affordable. The Cure for all diseases, you will find cures for cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and many, many others it is a book that I do not want to be without. If you already have cancer, you can also purchase The Cure for all cancers, and / or cure for all advanced cancers.

Cancer: Causes and Remedies


This article will not be a complex one due to the mass ignorance and fear associated with this subject and fatal pathology. Americans are already frightened to death about cancer and their gross ignorance only compounds the problem, plus, a lot has already been written on this subject, but in many writings, the content is a bit complex terminology-wise and served no beneficial purpose for the masses of the American people.
What Is Cancer?
Many people are succumbing to cancer and the two biggest factors in this succumbing to cancer are FEAR and IGNORANCE. Yes, people are ignorant to what cancer really is and as a result, they fear it.
In 400 B.C., Hippocrates assigned the name of Cancer or crab to a disease encountered during this era, because of its crab-like spread throughout the body. Cancer's Greek name was "Karkinos." In 164 A.D., Galen of Rome called the disease "tumor" which derived from the word "tymbos" meaning a sepulchral mound. In Latin, it was called "tumore" which meant "to swell."
Speaking in my most basic terms to really help the masses understand this pathology, cancer is an anaerobic condition which basically means cancer is the final result or stage of a low oxygen and very acidic state of existence. In a nutshell, this is what cancer is physiologically-speaking.
When someone has cancer, oxygen levels in the body are very low. The body's alkalinity is also very low. When there's low oxygen and alkalinity, the body's cells become abnormal. The cells of the body communicate with each other passing along vital information. Oxygen feeds the cells and allows for proper communication. But when there's lack of oxygen, a great lack of oxygen, this communication becomes thwarted and the cells start acting abnormally. This is why you hear many health specialists and experts say cancer is "abnormal cells" or "abnormal cell activity." This is true! Many doctors erroneously say cancer is a proliferation of dead cells, which is not true. If the cells were dead there would be no action. Cancer does denote abnormal cell activity and this abnormal cell activity is due to lack of oxygen and low alkaline level which means excessive acid level or acidosis.
This is what cancer is! And cancer is the second biggest killer of Americans (right behind heart disease) and Western medical experts predict that in the new millennium, one out of every two Americans will ultimately die of cancer. And this is true if we don't change our ways and our lives.
Americans generally don't have hearts (heart disease) and they are eating up on the inside (cancer).
Cancer patients/suffers begin to get thin and this is caused by an internal "eating up" process where certain cells start attacking other cells. Now while an "eating up" is taking place in the body, a neoplasm characterized by the uncontrolled growth of anaplastic cells invade surrounding tissue which metastasizes.
Neoplasm simply means "any abnormal growth of new tissue, benign or malignant." In other words, neoplasm means "tumor" which explains why cancer patients/sufferers become beleaguered with tumors inside of the body and outside of the body.
Anaplastic refers to "anaplasia" which means "a change in the structure of cells and in their orientation to each other characterized by a loss of differentiation and reversion to a more primitive form." Anaplasia is characteristic of malignancy.
Tumors exist in two states: benign and malignant. Benign means "not fatal or pernicious." Malignant means "highly injurious, pernicious or fatal."
Cancer is usually the cause of malignant tumors. In cases of benign tumors that are common in cases of fibroids and breast tumors, fluidic waste is usually the cause.
In cancerous individuals, white blood cells are numerous. The white blood cells begin to outnumber the red blood cells. White blood cells always denote toxicity, imbalance, poison, and foreign invasion of that which is unnatural or that which should not be in the body. Excessive white blood cell count is almost always indicative of cancer.
White blood cells have precursors known as "leukocytes," also called "leukocyte precursors." When bone marrow in the body is replaced with these leukocyte precursors in addition to abnormal numbers and forms of immature white blood cells in circulation that infiltrate the lymph nodes, spleen, liver and other filtering organs, the result is a form of cancer called "leukemia."
Leukemia was initially a cancer indicative of Caucasians in general and Caucasian children in particular. In my earlier teen days I used to always wonder why it was predominantly white children who perished from leukemia. I didn't understand why this form of cancer only seemed to occur in white people, especially white children.
But when I performed my own research and discovered that leukemia was a cancer found in 30% of dairy cows, it then made all the sense in the world to me why so many white children where dying of this cancer. The leukemia was coming from the cows via their milk and who drank the most milk? - White people and white children in particular. They were drinking milk at home, at school, at restaurants, etc. In fact, other cultures picked up the habit of drinking cow's milk from Europeans (Caucasians).
A good movie starring Nick Nolte and Julia Roberts came out in 1994 entitled "I Love Trouble" and in this film, its climax showcases and exposes a sinister plot involving milk production from cancerous cows and its relation to leukemia. Movies, though illusions, contain a lot of reality when you know what to look for. I'm a serious movie-goer and watcher/screener simply because I'm a researcher and the Rulers (of the Matrix) hide a lot of information in the movies and like they say, the best place to hide something is before the eyes. This is so true!
However, since the 1990s leukemia rates have risen sharply amongst African-Americans and it's easy to understand why. All you have to do is look at the high dairy consumption of African-Americans who are lactose-intolerant bio-genetically or by nature. But because they are unwisely following the Western/European-based high dairy diet of Caucasians, they too are now dropping like flies from leukemia.
I was shocked to learn that my South-Central Los Angeles neighborhood friend, Lucius Harris (of the NBA's New Jersey Nets), older brother named Dino, died of leukemia a few years ago. Dino was a cool dude. It was so strange and foreign to hear of a brother/Black male from the hood dying of leukemia. You always saw Dino back in the day (early 1980s) rollin' down the street in a sharp low rider bumping his sounds (playing his music) flossing with his cool afro. But this brother fell prey to a form of cancer that was foreign to African-Americans, at least 15-20 years ago.
So yes, leukemia rates are rising amongst African-Americans due to their consumption of dairy cow products such as ice cream, butter, cheese, sour cream, etc.
I have been warning African-Americans, especially Black females/women, for a long time now to leave dairy products alone because dairy is the greatest causative factor in many of the female pathologies such as uterine fibroid tumors that they suffer from. I tell them that dairy is "cow snot" and "cow poop" and have the videos in my collection to prove it.
Even though white people have customarily been consuming dairy products (mainly milk) for a long time, I also tell them it's no good for their bodies either. They may have a greater tolerance for milk and dairy products than other races and cultures, but it still negatively affects them too.
Milk does not do a body good (unless you're a baby cow [calf]). Got milk? If you do, you got nothing but PUS (MUCUS)! Almond Breeze, Rice Dream, coconut, soy and oat-based milks are better choices and alternatives for milk, at least for human consumption.
And beware people! Don't fall for the latest scheme that milk helps in weight loss. The dairy industry is playing on American women's emotions in the area of obesity and excess weight. If milk helps in weight loss, then why are cows so damn big? The milk should neutralize the growth hormones that are given to cows and prevent them from being so weighty.
The Dangers of Chemotherapy and Radiation
Western medicine's approach to treating cancer is the cut, slash and burn technique which is insane and diabolical to me. You have to be out of your damn mind to take or undergo chemotherapy
.
Chemotherapy is chemical therapy, but what kind of chemicals? Can you say PETROLEUM? That's right! Chemotherapy is nothing but rock fuel (petroleum) that comes straight from the Rockefeller pharmaceutical drug cartel. The Rockefellers owns the 15 largest pharmaceutical companies in the world in addition to the American medical industry and cartel. Is it any wonder that the Rockefellers use petroleum drugs in their medical industry and cartel that they also own, considering that they also own and dominate the petroleum industry?
There is also a big connection between the automotive industry and cancer. The temple of the modern method of cancer treatment in the corporate United States is the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute in New York where young actress Michelle Thomas (of Family Matters sitcom) was murdered, oops, I mean "died."
Alfred P. Sloan was president of General Motors Corporation for a number of years. Charles Kettering created the auto ignition, lights, starters and other electrical systems. Now why would individuals such as the Rockefellers, Sloan and Kettering be involved in the medical industry in general and cancer therapy (chemotherapy) in particular? Can you say BIG BUSINESS?
Oh yes, cancer is big business in the United States. The American Cancer Society, launched by the father of advertising, Albert Lasker, brings in hundreds of millions of dollars per year and has been doing so for many years and still they have no cure for cancer in Western/allopathic medicine. In truth, they are not even looking for one because the money is made in keeping people sick, performing surgery, and saturating cancer victims/patients with chemotherapy and radiation.
The Cancer industry knows the American people want a miracle pill that they can just pop into their mouth to knock cancer out (which will NEVER happen). The American people want this because a miracle pill would allow them to keep living lavishly and frivolously while eating their beloved degenerate, denatured and devalued Standard American Diet.
No pill will ever knock out (cure) any disease. A single pill didn't cause the pathology. It was the thought process (mindset), diet and lifestyle (or death style) of the person that caused the pathology. And yes, consuming various or multiple pills (drugs) plays a role in the development of pathology. Disease is multidimensional and not one dimensional. Unfortunately for Western allopathic medicine, they treat disease in a one dimensional way.
Nearly one million people die from cancer in the United States every year. In all due honesty cancer patients/sufferers are not dying from cancer. They are in effect dying from the cancer treatments - chemotherapy and radiation and the belief that they are going to die (thanks to the unwise doctor telling the cancer patient this).
Folks, chemotherapy is POISON! If you give chemotherapy to a healthy person, the person will become sick. Now how can that which will make a healthy person sick be given to a sick person and expect to make them well? Where in the world is the logic in this?
The human body is NOT made up of chemotherapy (petroleum). Therefore, petroleum is a foreign substance in the body and will cause the body's defense mechanism to kick in. But in cancerous persons, their bodies are already too weak to resist and fight the foreign substance.
Chemotherapy is so toxic, poisonous, and injurious that it makes the hair fall out. This alone should tell you something. You're going to treat the cancer but one of the many side effects is that the hair on your head and face is going to fall off and out? This is outright insane and absurd, but yet in still hundreds of thousands of poor, frightened and ignorant individuals unwisely subject themselves to this insidious invasive process and to their great doom and demise.
The other widespread insidious technique used on cancer victims, oops, I mean "patients," is RADIATION! Now you've really got to be out of your damn mind to undergo this treatment. Radiation has no place in the human body, at least not in the body of a healthy and sane person.
Radiation is based upon the toxic element "radium oxide," a serious poison to the human body. Radiation treatment leads to radium neuritis and myalgia. Radiation is used under the illogical premise of killing the cancerous cells in the body, but how are you going to kill the cancerous cells of the body without harming and killing the good/beneficial cells of the body? Folks, radiation kills ALL cells in an indiscriminate way. This treatment and process literally burns and cooks your flesh and have you ever smelled cooked flesh of a living human being? It STINK something terrible, people! I know from first hand experience (with my beloved father who succumbed to lung cancer in 1994).
And for the males with prostate cancer, the insidious medical industry has a new technique that utilizes "radiation seeds" whereby doctors inject tiny radiation-like seeds in the male reproductive system including the testicles. The result is serious damage to the rectum.
Chemotherapy and radiation treatment is modern-day voluntary TORTURE, plain and simple!
Surgery
You'd have to be seriously out of your mind to undergo surgery while suffering from cancer. Surgery opens the body up and exposes the insides of the body to oxygen which causes cancer cells to spread rapidly and out of control. This is a sure-way ticket to an early and premature death, and not to mention, a very painful death.
Yes, cancer victims/patients experience a pain out of this world. In fact, this pain is so bad, many cancer victims/patients beg for death. I witnessed this with my father back in 1994. He became a skeleton. I remember my Uncle Larry and my Cousin Dennis attempting to get my father out of his bed one day and the man screamed for them to put him down and just leave him alone. The pain in moving him was unbearable.
People, it is a pain out of this world! This is why many cancer victims/patients are given pain killer drugs which do absolutely no justice at all. For most, they just end up praying to God to quickly remove them from their misery.
My poor mother was also one of these individuals, succumbing to pancreatic cancer (the worst cancer you could ever have) in 1999. It was my mother's death that served as the quintessential catalyst for me to finally get up and start promoting and selling my herbal concoctions to the public. It was fear that prevented my mother from taking herbs during her bout with cancer. She opted for the Western solution (torture) and paid dearly for it.
Allopathic doctors had my mother on all kinds of drugs, mostly painkillers. My little sister reported to me that my mother was throwing up so bad (from the chemotherapy and other drugs) that she was throwing up her bowels. I heard horror stories about my mother and her experience in the hospital with cancer. It was because of all that I heard from my siblings and family members that I consciously chose not to visit her in the hospital during her last and dying days. I didn't want to remember my mother this way and in that condition like I had done with my father out of familial pressure. When it was time to view my mother's body at her funeral, before the casket was opened, I got up and walked out of the church and stood outside just looking at the Compton, California neighborhood my mother grew up in. My poor mother was reduced to skin and bones due to cancer.
So as far as surgery is involved, if you have cancer and decide on surgery, all I can say is: Kiss Me Goodnight, because ultimately you're finished, through, 86ed, terminated, done, etc.
Personally, I'd recommend the new and effective alternative cancer treatment, Poly MVP and hyperbaric oxygen therapy instead of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.

The Cancer Research Industry



Many volunteers around the world are committed to raise funds for cancer research and cancer charities. Many of the hundreds of thousands of jobs in the industry as carers, or research, the prescription, diagnosis and drug production. Large companies spend fortunes on cancer research. After so long and so many billions, what is cancer research reveal?

There has been steady progress in the understanding of cancer, but little progress in its treatment. Modern cancer research began in 1940 and '50, when scientists isolated substances that kill cancer cells growing in laboratory cell culture dish or leukemia in mice. early successes in chemotherapy set the pace and got a lot of media, although they were only 5% of cancer treatments at most.

Serving humanity by solving its major diseases has a celebrity status, there are a lot of congratulations and an air of Hollywood involved in these things. Cancer Research is a high activity level and sometimes scientific treatment found that the recognition of gain is large, such as HPV-16 trial, but only applies himself to the treatment of a small percentage of cancers. media hype is part of the problem of how we see cancer. The first discoveries created an expectation that there was a cure all treatments, a "magic formula" that would make its discoverer famous for the treatment of cancer worldwide. The idea comes in part from aspirin, the original ball that finds its way by magic and decreases pain.

In the 1950's and 60's huge and expensive research project to test every known substance, which is carried out in cancer cells. You may recall was discovered in Madagascar Periwinkle (Catharansus roseus), which revealed alkaloids (vinblastine and vincristine), which are still used in chemotherapy. Taxol, ovarian and breast cancer originates in the Pacific yew tree. The treatment for testicular cancer and small cell lung cancer called Etoposide 'was derived from the May apple. In "Plants used against cancer 'by Jonathan Hartwell over 3,000 plants identified by medical sources and folklore to treat cancer, of which about half were found to have any effect on cancer cells in test tubes.

When these plants are designer drugs, are chemicals only in isolation and the rest of the plant is usually discarded. The medically active compounds extracted from plants and modified until they are chemically unique. Then, the compound is patented, where a brand name and tested.

In the first phase, usually will be tested in animals, the second phase will determine the dosage levels and in phase 3, is tested in people. When approved by the Federal Drug Authority (USA) or Medicines and Health Regulation establishing the Agency (MHRA) in Britain, the cost of developing a new drug can reach five hundred million dollars, which was recovered the end consumer.

In addition to "targeted therapy" research as research chemicals that effect cancer cells, basic research continues, the differences between normal cells and cancer cells. In the past 30 years, this research has revealed much about our nature, but still no cure. Here are some chapters of scientific research on cancer.

Antibody-guided therapy: this is "magic bullet" of the original. Cancer researchers use monoclonal antibodies to carry poisons directly to cancer cells without harming others.

Chronobiology: much of what happens in our bodies is governed by cycles of the female cycle monthly cycle of brain waves. Human health depends on the interaction cycles adapted to acts of perception, respiration, reproduction and renewal. Chronobiology analyze these cycles over different times as day and night. Hormones, including stress and hormones, have their own bikes. For example, they may be at their peak of activity in the morning and calmer at night. Cancer cells seem not to obey the same cycle rate than normal cells.

Anti-telomerase: one part of a cell, called telomerase, regulates the life cycle of a cell and how many times it can reproduce. Some cancer cells escape this control and may increase the number of times they divide, becoming 'immortal'. Scientists hope to gain control of cancer cells by blocking the action of telomerase.

Anti-angiogenesis: secondary tumors (metastases) may be folded around the cells to grow new blood vessels to feed tumors, to supply oxygen and nutrients for the growth of cancer. This process is called angiogenesis, and this research is to find a way to stop the signals from normal cells that start the process.

anti-adhesion molecules: the cancer cells arise tufts, as opposed to a petri dish, which is part of a more flat. When they appear to be cells of a quality that can withstand the treatment. This research examines the ways that you can block all cell aggregation, dissolving clumps of more effective therapy.

Anti-oncogene: some elements of DNA, called oncogenes that play an important role in promoting cancer growth. Drugs that interfere with the production of oncogenes may be useful in the treatment of cancer in the future.

Gene therapy: research the use of tumor suppressor genes underlines the British National Cancer Plan as an important factor. In essence, DNA fragments is inserted to replace missing or damaged genes, possibly preventing the development of cancer from someone who might be "high risk".

Vaccines: very quietly finding a cure for cancer generally has ruled on the other hand, finding a vaccine. The whole idea of a cure or a treatment that is "all the same" breaks the specific case, the chaotic conditions that cause cancer in an individual. After billions in research and the Holy Grail of cancer therapy, research now is to find a vaccine.

In a recent conference in cancer immunologists immunology U.S. more than 21 countries participated in conferences on subjects such as immunology later: cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting, the cancer antigen discovery, control and analysis of the immune response to cancer in humans, the development of cancer vaccines.

Cancer Vaccine Collaborative (CVC) was launched to much excitement. This is a unique research program to improve the way vaccines are developed against cancer, based on a collaboration of six medical centers in New York and Minnesota. The aim of their research is how to effectively immunize against cancer using a vaccine that uses "action research".

Vaccines made from donor blood have been proven to work for certain cancers. The experiments of bone marrow transplants show there are about 40,000 different fabrics, it is difficult to find a match. Usually a perfect match can be found in the immediate family of the patient. Bad matches can create a host of secondary dis-plains. Scientist are finding ways to train killer T cells taken either from the host or a donor, to better attack cancer cells. They noted that donors Killer T-cells that are already "primed" for a particular cancer (eg, cells of the body donors to "remember" of the disease) can be very effective. It may take several years to prove the validity, reliability, safety and efficacy of this treatment. Harvesting the natural immunity of our own cells or donor using gene technology may well become a major player against the immune system attacks the modern dis-plains.

Increased screening: this type of research will examine individuals who may be genetically at high risk of certain cancers and is part of preparation for possible vaccines. Genetic counseling is intended to be 21st century health care based on prevention of the disease, even better.

Combinations: the search for West Germany (Big Sart-Maticek) argues that there is no single cause for cancer, similar to the model of more chronic disease. It shows that there are environmental, psychological and spiritual disease. This means that treatment should be level and that a single treatment is likely to be effective because there is no single cause. This observation links with the position of holistic practitioners often have a broader view of health than orthodox doctors.

Dr. Robert Buckman is an experienced cancer researcher, and author of the informative book: ". What you really need to know about cancer," he summarizes what he sees the current state of scientific research on cancer:


Seven Secrets About Breast Cancer


Secret # 1 breast cancer research money does not guarantee that women receive less breast cancer.

Secret # 2 You need to take action against breast cancer before reaching 50 and you can not rely on mammograms.

Secret # 3 You're at risk for breast cancer, even if you do not have it in your family.

Secret # 4 Most of the funds used for research on prevention should not be fewer women suffer the devastating effects of breast cancer in the future.

Secret # 5 The majority of women are breast-aware and afraid of breast cancer.

Secret # 6 Women do not have many tips on how they can protect their breasts against breast cancer.

Secret # 7 most women do not understand the importance of their breasts and not do everything possible to heal and protect them.

The above "secrets" are things that are not commonly known and most women can not be a surprise for you. In this article, I will shed light on these facts and to give women to make their own conclusions about how they feel about breast health.

SECRET # 1 money on research of breast cancer is not to ensure that fewer women breast cancer.

The pink ribbon and breast cancer awarenss months was introduced in the United States in 1985 and introduced in the United Kingdom in 1993. Pink Ribbon Foundation is run by Estée Lauder Companies (known for cosmetics and skincare).

Since then, the symbol of the pink ribbon has become synonymous with breast cancer and in the last 15 years, billions of pounds have been raised on their behalf. Each October, the world celebrates Awareness Month and breast cancer fundraiser this month is phenomenal. All charities Breast Cancer compete to see who can reach the most innovative "Pink" fundraising. Are pieces of pink roses and sell products to raise funds. Many companies involved and special promotions in October for their favorite charity. "Rosa" is a great thing.

So all this money raised in October and at other times during the year through events such as charity walks and runs, if the effect on rates of breast cancer in Britain and around the world? I came down? Fewer women are suffering from the devastating effects of breast cancer?

Unfortunately, the answer is "no."

Great Britain from 1993-2004, the incidence of breast cancer increased by 18.5%, which is 1% per year. Ninth women the disease during their lifetime on current projections by July 1, 2010. 45 500 women were found in 2005, which corresponds to 125 women every day. Worldwide, more than one million women with breast cancer each year. It is also estimated that breast cancer rates will rise most in developing countries where women lack access to quality care and where they can be marginalized in certain societies.

Breast cancer survival has improved. Each year, over 12,300 women and 70 men will die of breast cancer. Since peaking in the late 1980s, mortality from breast cancer has fallen by a third. drugs against breast cancer helped save the lives of women, but as with all drugs can have long term side affects. Also the cost of these drugs put pressure on the NHS. Although rates of breast cancer continues to increase, as they did, according to Professor Karol Sikora, as reported in the Daily Mail on 09/09/2008, "the next generation of drugs would keep patients living longer, but could swallow half the current NHS budget within four years from cancer. (this applies to all drugs against cancer at a cost of 50 billion pounds).

With millions of dollars are being raised by people around the world on behalf of breast cancer, it's just that women are actually more of this devastating disease every year?

Do Bacteria Cause Cancer?


Microbes are everywhere around us, on our skin, in our noses and in our guts, and even in our blood and tissues.

They are usually harmless to exist to balance the immune system. Some are benign: in the human gut bacteria to help digest food, produce vitamins, and move the toxic pathogens. In reality, the human body contains more bacterial cells that the somatic (body) cells.

The mitochondria, energy or produce nuclear in human cells, have their own DNA and are supposed to come from free-living bacteria. The bacteria are highly integrated functions in the human body.

conventional community health is ready to accept some types of bacteria or viruses can in fact be responsible for one of the few forms of cancer such as Kaposi's sarcoma, cancer of the stomach and cervix, but are not willing to recognize that infectious agents may be intimately linked with the development of most other tumors as well.

However, scientific evidence was more than one hundred years that points to a bacterial cause cancer, a pleomorphic (many of them trained), bacteria, mycoplasma related or similar, which was seen in microscopic slides of many tumors.

Since 20 century, the bacterial origin of cancer was considered a mainstream theory, and articles published in Lancet. However, it was later shelved despite a lot of essential evidence.

Over the past century, hundreds of independent researchers have found a link between bacteria and cancer in animals and humans, but its results have been treated as a scientific curiosity and rarely followed by the establishment of general medicine.

However, the theory has not disappeared, and scientists have continued to seek ways to identify and remove suspicious bacteria.

In 1890, German physician and bacteriologist Robert Koch formulated standard criteria used to assess whether a certain bacteria to cause a specific disease.

"Koch's postulates," though not always valid, provide a good reference point for researchers of disease.

Koch's postulates are as follows:

The bacteria are present in all cases of the disease.

Bacteria isolated from the host's disease and increases the pure culture.

specific disease must be repeated when a pure culture of bacteria is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host.

The bacteria must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host.

However, Koch's postulates have limitations, even Koch acknowledged. They can not hold if:

Specific bacteria (such as that which causes leprosy) can not be "grown in pure culture in the laboratory.

Animal test subjects are immune to infection.

In addition, bacteria that are normally harmless can cause illness if:

Acquired additional virulence factors that pathogens.

It makes access to deep tissues by trauma, surgery, one drop, etc.

That infects a patient with a compromised immune system.

Not everyone infected by the bacteria to develop a serious disease, subclinical infection of low quality may be more common than clinically apparent, symptomatic infection.

The different species of pathogens associated with various cancers fit quite well in the Koch's postulates, because they can be isolated from tumors and grown in a petri dish or cell cultures, and they sometimes give tumors when injected into laboratory animals.

However, many also found in lower concentrations in healthy subjects, and it appears that these microbes only cause disease when the host is weakened.

Host immune system limits the amount of damages an infectious agent can cause. For example, infection with H. pylori cause stomach ulcers and stomach cancer, but many people are asymptomatic carriers. Not all women who were infected by HPV develop cancer of the cervix.

Similarly, we should not expect that all other carriers' cancer germs and get sick. Moreover, these bacteria may have the ability to produce disease than cancer, because H. pylori can cause stomach ulcers as well.

History

Probably the first official mention of "cancer microbe" took place December 3, 1890, when William Russell, a pathologist at the School of Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, gave an address to the Pathological Society of London . He described the histopathological findings of "a characteristic organism of cancer" he observed with a microscope tissue sections stained with fuchsin all forms of cancer that he studied, and also some cases of tuberculosis, syphilis and skin infection.

Microbe has been seen both around and within the tissue cells varied in size and barely visible in one and half times that of red blood cells. Russell believes that the large size of some of these bodies, indicative of a yeast or fungal infections.

Russell microbe can provisionally called "blastomycete" (type of fungus), and rounded shapes so-called "magenta plants" because their properties reddish-blue.

Nine years later, in 1899, Russell published a report in The Lancet on "The parasite of cancer" and said that the conclusion of the bacteria suspected of other diseases that cancer has a stone of stumbling "to the idea of a definitive role for the agencies.

Cultures yielded numerous species of bacteria, and bacteria injected animals gave ambiguous results. Later, many scientists concluded that Russell bodies were merely the result of a degeneration of cells.

In 1920 and 1930, the researcher Royal Raymond Rife pioneer in the RF devices used to kill bacteria. Rampant, it was found that certain frequencies of radio waves, was lethal bacteria, but harmless to human tissues. He also invented a new type of microscope, which used monochromatic light, and was accurate enough to see the air viruses by electron microscopy.

Working in a laboratory in La Jolla, in 1930, said Rife success rate of 100 percent in the treatment of cancer. Rampant in the laboratory was closed due to political pressure from the American Medical Association, most of his papers were destroyed, and currently the only known example of a microscope, there are a museum.

Rife discovered radio frequency devices to kill bacteria, were picked up by Hulda Clark, a Canadian researcher who began working in 1960. Clark also said that many other diseases including diabetes, allergies, epilepsy, Crohn's disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, are caused by bacteria and parasites such as liver fluke.

Improved the Rife technology, and invented a small device raidofrequency called "Zapper" that is required to eradicate the bacteria and other parasites from the body. Instructions on how to build the devices are made available to the public, and can be found on the Internet today.

Clark has been harassed by U.S. authorities until he left to establish his cancer clinic in Mexico where, in 2001, the authorities have forbidden to offer alternative treatments for cancer. Like Rife, Clark claimed a very high success rate in treating cancer is almost 100 percent, but no independent analysis of his claims or those of Rife found.

In the 1960s, countered Dr. Virginia Livingston, the scientific establishment by claiming to have found a bacterium that causes cancer, naming him "cryptocides ancestor" which means "hidden killer". She found that the microbe was a symbiotic function inherent in the human body that was responsible for initiating life and healing of tissues and that the microbe was ultimately responsible for any degeneration and death of all life.

When the body of culture was injected into animals, it caused tumors to develop in some but not all, of the test subjects.

In 1974, Livingstone, the first scientist to discover that bacteria and cancer in both cancer cells produce the hormone HCG human. This hormone, normally secreted by the human fetus for protection from the maternal immune system also protects cancer immune attack.

Livingstone concluded that bacteria secrete mutagenic factors such as actinomycin-D cells with human DNA damage, and can exchange genetic material as factors in the growth of bacteria with human cells. Cancer vaccines targeting HCG production and promotion of the bacteria to deprive cancer cells of a key source of HCG .. Since hCG is low, the immune system's ability to launch an assault on the increases in cancer cells.

Livingstone cultivation of bacteria in patients 'own blood and urine to create a "autogenous' vaccines stimulate the immune system. He has published numerous articles and books like" cancer, new initiatives "(1972)," Microbiology of Cancer (1977 ) and "Conquest of Cancer" (1984).

His research has been confirmed by other scientists, such as microbiologist Eleanor Alexander-Jackson, cell cytologist Irene Diller, biochemist Florence Seibert, and dermatologist Alan Cantwell, among others.

Milton Wainwright, a microbiologist at the University of Sheffield, UK, wrote a lot of Bacteriology cancer in recent publications, such as "nanobacteria and" elementary bodies in human disease and cancer "(1999)," the return of germs cancer; Forgotten Microbiology - Back to the Future "(2000)," Highly pleomorphic staphylococci cause cancer "(2000) and" E 'a historical' cancer germ '? "(2003).

Currently, one of the best defenders in the known link between cancer and bacteria is popular Dr. Alan Cantwell, who wrote numerous articles and books on the subject. Cantwell isolated and identified the bacterial cell wall-deficient breast cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma and Hodgkin's disease. He said: "If a disease like cancer is indeed caused by microscopic bacteria will show doctors were unable to see what was obvious to some scientists in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, to observe the simple light microscope .

And with powerful electron microscopes, there is now little excuse for not "see" bacteria. "

Mycoplasma

Mycoplasma, the oldest of the suspected bacterial theory of cancer, was also involved as a direct cause or a signficant cofactoer and many other degenerative and inflammatory diseases.

Mycoplasmas are often found in the oral and urogenital tracts of healthy subjects, with females four times more often infected than men, which happens to be the same gender-skewed incidence of rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and other autoimmune diseases.

In 1997, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases, published the article, Mycoplasmas: sophisticated, reemerging, and burdened by their notoriety, by Drs. Base and Tully who stated:

"However, mycoplasmas, in itself can cause acute and chronic diseases are more sites where the vast complications and has been involved as cofactors of the disease.

Recently, mycoplasmas have been linked as a cofactor in the pathogenesis of AIDS and malignant transformation, chromosomal aberrations, the Gulf War syndrome and other unexplained illnesses and complex, including chronic fatigue syndrome, Crohn's disease and various arthritides. "

The first strains of mycoplasma have been isolated from cattle with arthritis and pleuro-pneumonia in 1898 at the Institut Pasteur. The first black man was isolated in 1932 from an abscess of the wound.

First Contact mycoplasmas have been found to cause rheumatic diseases in 1939, Drs. Swift and Brown. At the end of 1950, a specific location has been found to cause atypical pneumonia, and named Mycoplasma pneumonia.

The association between immune deficiency and immune disorders, and mycoplasmas were found for the first time in mid-1970 in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia (an autoimmune disease) due to infection of four species of mycoplasma localized in joint tissue.

Since then, more than 100 different species of mycoplasma have been identified and recorded on plants, animals and humans.

There are hundreds of scientific studies from around the world among different species of mycoplasma by cancer.

Research by Dr. Shy-Chung Lo Institute of Pathology Armed Forces in Washington, DC, confirms the multi-stage malignant transformation of embryonic cell lines continuously exposed to mycoplasma infection, animal models and exposed.

According to a study by Chan PJ, published in Gynecologic Oncology (1996), "The oncogenic potential of mycoplasmas has been achieved recently when they were shown to cause chromosomal aberrations and cell transformation in vitro by the gradual and progressive loss of chromosome transfer ". Chan and colleagues also report the prevalence of Mycoplasma DNA in the ovary cancer.1

In 1993, a research team led by C. Ilantzis McGill Cancer Centre, Montreal, Canada analyzed markers associated with cancer that are specific to different body organs. These markers, called "organ-specific neoantigens (OSN), causes a specific immune response. After the analysis of proteins NSOs human colon adenocarcinoma, the researchers found mycoplasma in OSN origin2

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Chan PJ, et al Prevalence of mycoplasma conserved DNA in malignant ovarian cancer detected using sensitive PCR-ELISA pp 258-260 Gynecologic Oncology 1996 (3)

(2). C Ilantzis, DM, Thomson, Michaelidou, S Benchimol Identification of human cancer related organ-specific neoantigen Microbiol Immunol, 1993, 37 (2) :119-28

Microscopic evaluation

The "cancer bacteria" has a variable appearance in both tissue samples and cultures. They may appear as shells (circles) 0.1 microns (one micron equals one thousandth of a millimeter), called "submicroscopic" because they can still be seen by an ordinary light microscope.

The researchers used the term "nanobacteria" to describe the very small bacteria, ranging from 0.05 to 0.2 microns in size. The virus, which measures 0.01 to 0.02 micrometers, can only be viewed under the electron microscope. The smallest bacteria can easily pass through the pores of the filter standard virus 0 0.2 micrometres, which microbiologists assumed (until recently) would reach all the bacteria, which tend to be much higher.

When these young leaders are placed in a petri dish and the resulting culture was observed over time, bacteria also produce large stems and branched fungal-like filaments.

Mycobacteria are known in different formats, and TB microbe, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is a good example of this complex life cycle. Some forms of Bacillus is round "coccoid" forms, other forms are typically "acid-fast" and "real" forms. All mycobacteria are phylogenetically link or bridge for the bacteria and the "higher" fungi. "MyCo" in greek mushroom. This is the term "noise". Mycoplasma is also flowing into the plasma as in the structure without a cell wall - that is, "plasma".

Contrary to common bacteria, which are suspected cancer microbe Mycoplasma no cell wall. It penetrates the cells of tissues and cells to be repeated, as well as anti-retroviral drugs. When an outbreak of Mycoplasma cell, takes a piece with the host cell membrane. When the immune system attacks the Mycoplasma, may also mistakenly attack the host cell, causing an autoimmune condition. You can attack the natural killer cells are the immune system, which causes immune system disorders. Why can hide deep in the cells, it is very difficult to detect and remove.

Antibiotics for the treatment of Mycoplasma

Antibiotic treatment should be tailored to bacterial infections. Many bacteria, including mycoplasma, do not affect many common antibiotics. However, some targeted therapies, which are known to kill specific bacteria that cause cancer have proved effective, at least in the early stages of the disease.

Mycoplasma treatable with long cycles of high doses of antibiotics such as doxycycline and tetracycline, followed by a long period of low dose antibiotics. Because of their lack of cell wall, mycoplasmas are resistant to penicillins. Since the organism is slow growing, intracellular species with a long shelf life, over the longer term antibiotics may be needed. The infection may require treatment for several months or years, virtually the same protocol as for Lyme disease.

No clinical studies have been published on cancer treatment with antibiotics against mycoplasma.

Vaccines against Mycoplasma

Maruyama vaccine like BCG, who are both due to mycobacteria tuberculosis isolates. Both have been widely used as a stimulant of the immune system in cancer patients. Murayama vaccine is made from mycobacteria tuberculosis isolates, and BCG is derived from a bacillus of bovine tuberculosis attenuated. However, BCG has more side effects than the vaccine Maruyama.

Maruyama vaccine, invented by Dr. Chisato Maruyama more than 50 years may be used alone or in combination with standard treatments. Some Japanese doctors claim to have achieved complete remission for poor prognosis cancers, but no large clinical trial exist. No adverse effects of the vaccine have been reported.

Murayama vaccine approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with terminal cancer. Some forms of medical insurance covers the cost if the vaccine is used as part of standard therapy, as it is officially approved only as an immune stimulant to counteract the side effects of bone marrow depression caused by radiotherapy.

Maruyama vaccine issued by the Research Institute of vaccine therapy for tumors and infectious diseases, Nippon Medical School Hospital in Tokyo, as long as the patient provide a request from their doctor. It is not expensive, about 9,000 yen (100 USD) for a treatment of 40 days.

According to an article published in the detection and prevention of cancer, 2003, Tetsuo Kimoto MD, Ph.D., Maruyama vaccine does not have direct cytotoxic effects on tumors, but the reasons for their homes and collagen.

This leads to necrosis of contention and sometimes (death) of tumors and their metastases. The survival time has increased in both animals and humans with tumors, and Kimoto Murayama said that the vaccination "can benefit patients whose tumors are inoperable and resistant to conventional chemotherapy." 1

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Tetsuo Kimoto MD, Ph.D. antitumor effects of Maruyama vaccine (SSM), the detection and cancer prevention Volume 22 Issue 4 Page 340 - August 1998.

Herpes Virus

Cervical cancer, caused by human papilloma virus, affects more than 10,000 U.S. women each year, killing more than 3,700. A new vaccine against the virus, Gardasil was approved by the FDA in 2006. The vaccine is effective against HPV types 16 and 18 cause about 70 percent of cervical cancers and HPV types 6 and 11 cause 90 percent of genital warts.

Less known is the fact that HPV is also implicated in squamous cell head and neck, especially cancer of the tonsils. 1.2 Researchers from Johns Hopkins Oncology Center tested tumor tissue from 253 patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and found 25 per cent of cases were positive for HPV. In 90 percent of HPV-positive tumors, HPV16, the type of virus most often associated with cervical present.3

Several studies confirm the link between HPV and head and neck cancer. Approximately 31,000 people in the United States are diagnosed annually with cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx, causing 8,500 deaths a year.

The HPV vaccine works only if administered before infection, indicating the importance of immunization before potential exposure to the virus. Also, Gardasil does not protect against less common HPV types not included in the vaccine, thus routine and regular pap screening remain vitally important to detect precancerous changes in the cervix to allow treatment before cervical cancer develops. This is a preventive measure, not a treatment for cancer of the cervix existing or head and neck.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Paz IB, et al. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in head and neck. An association of HPV 16 with squamous cell carcinoma of Waldeyer's tonsillar ring. Cancer February 1, 1997, 79 (3) :595-604.

(2) Klussman JP et al, HPV positive tonsillar carcinomas:. Another tumor entity? With Immunol Microbiol (Berlin) in August 2003, 192 (3) :129-32. Epub 2002 September 14.

(3). Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, Zahurak ML, Daniel RW, Viglione M, symer DE, Shah KV, Sidransky D, proof of a causal link between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancer. Magazine National Cancer Institute. 2000 if 3 92 (9) :709-20

Stomach cancer

In December 2000 edition of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, a research team led by British pathologist Pelayo Correa said that antibiotics, vitamin C or beta-carotene (precursor of vitamin A) can reverse stomach precancerous conditions caused by Helicobacter pylori.

Stomach cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide, and is more common in countries like Colombia and China, where H. pylori infects over half the population in early childhood. United States, where H. pylori is less common, rates of stomach cancer has decreased since the 1930's.

The two main risk factors for stomach cancer is infection with H. pylori, and a diet low in vitamin C and beta-carotene, which the body converts to vitamin A. There is also ample evidence that a diet containing fruits and vegetables that are rich in these nutrients, protects against stomach cancer.

In 1992, researchers studied 631 patients with full stomach cell growth, which is one of three consecutive steps precancerous - nonmetaplastic multifocal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia.

The patients received a placebo pill, vitamin C or beta-carotene supplements or antibiotics against H. pylori. Others were a combination of drugs and supplements.

Researchers found gastric biopsies of patients after 3 and 6 years of treatment. Patients with atrophy were about five times more likely to experience regression of the growth of precancerous cells that achieve a placebo.

Among those with metaplasia, the volunteers taking supplements or drugs were three times more likely to improve as the placebos were. However, patients with dysplasia, the last stage of the disease of the stomach before the cancer did not show significant improvement with treatment. "The earlier in the process [who intervened] the better the chance of regression," Correa said. 1

This study is encouraging because it shows that the treatment of cancer-causing bacteria, provides clear benefits against precancerous conditions. However, when tissue damage caused by the infection had developed in the precancerous stage, the antibiotics produced no benefits, and would probably produce no improvement in cases of outright malignancy, either.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Correa, P., et al. The 2000th Chemoprevention of gastric dysplasia: randomized trial of antioxidant supplements and anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. National Cancer Institute Magazine 92 (December 6) :1881-1888

Lymphoma

The common antibiotic doxycycline effectively treats a type of ocular lymphoma associated with chlamydia, according to a study published in the October 4 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

A team of researchers led by Andres JM Ferreri, MD, San Raffaele H Scientific Institute in Milan, Italy, gave 27 patients with ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) a course of 3 weeks of doxycycline treatment, whether positive or negative for chlamydia.

The researchers looked at tumor progression every 6 months, and found that doxycycline caused a regression caused lymphoma in patients regardless of whether they were positive or negative for chlamydia.

The study suggests that doxycycline is a useful therapy even in patients where other treatments have failed, and it is a real alternative to chemotherapy and radiation without causing the same toxic side effects. Patients treated with doxycycline had a rate of 66% disease-free survival. 1

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Andrés JM Ferreri, Maurilio Ponzoni, Massimo Guidoboni, reimbursement rates Antonio Giordano, Letterio S. Politi Sergio Cortelazzo, Judit Demeter, Francesco Zallio, Angelo Palmas, Giuliana Muti, Giuseppina P. Dognin, Elisa Pasini, Antonia Anna Lettini, Federico Sacchetti, Carlo The Conciliis, Claudio Doglioni, Riccardo Dolcetti Bacteria-eradicating therapy with doxycycline in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: A prospective multicenter trial Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98 ( 19) :1375-1382

Caution regarding the use of antibiotics

So far, no antibiotic treatment has been observed that successful treatment of most cancers, and research combining the use of antibiotics are at increased risk of breast cancer was published in February 2004, Journal of American Medical Association. A survey of 10 000 women in the State of Washington, found that those who took more than 25 courses of antibiotics over an average of 17 years had double the risk of developing breast cancer than women who are not antibiotics. The women who took one and 25 prescriptions over the same period was one and a half times higher risk of developing breast cancer. 1

Correlation does not always mean causation, and this study raises interesting questions regarding the mechanism of this effect. Perhaps this is due to direct cellular damage caused by antibiotics. Perhaps the disruption of normal homeostasis of bacteria to antibiotics leads to the proliferation of pathogenic bacterial species.

It could be that women with poorly functioning immune system (due to genetics or poor living conditions) are more prone to infections and cancer. A need for antibiotics may indicate underlying disease or inflammatory diseases, which is responsible for the development of cancer.

However, the study illustrates the dangers of using broad-spectrum antibiotics indiscriminately. This practice is clearly not to prevent cancer, and is not recommended.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Roberta B. Ness, MD, MPH. Jane A. Cauley, antibiotics and breast cancer DrPH -. What is the meaning of this? 291:77 February Journal American Medical Association 2004, 880-881

Antibiotics to treat cancer

In 2006, researchers have discovered at the University of Illinois at siomycin, an unknown reality first antibiotic discovered in 1960, caused cancer cells to apoptosis (cell death), while normal cells unharmed. This is due to a direct effect on FOX M1 gene that is activated in tumor cells and causes their rapid growth. Siomycin being evaluated for possible clinical studies. 1

Neomycin, another former first antibiotic discovered in 1949, inhibits angiogenesis (blood vessel development) of prostate tumors and prevents them from growing and spreading in animal subjects, according to researchers and Yoshioka Hu in September 2006 work of the National Academy of Sciences. 2

In both cases, the activity of these antibiotics is a direct effect of chemotherapy, no antibacterial activity. However, both these substances promising developments in chemotherapy, without the side effects current horrendous.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------

(1). Senthil K. Radhakrishnan, G. Uppoor Bhat, Douglas E. Hughes, I-Ching Wang, Robert H. Costa, and Andrei L. Gartel Identification of Chemical inhibitor of oncogenic transcription factor forkhead Box M1 Cancer Research 66, 9731-9735, October 1, 2006

(2). Hu GF. Neomycin inhibits angiogenin-induced angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science. U.S. 95: 9791-9795, 1998

Integrated Treatment Clinics

Livingstone, said Wheeler, a success rate of 82% in his book "The conquest of cancer."

One of the largest clinics offering treatment based on the hypothesis of cancer is the bacterial Livingstone Wheeler Foundation Medical Center, San Diego, California. Livingstone, said Wheeler, a success rate of 82% in his book "The conquest of cancer." Here, patients receive vaccines and other measures to strengthen the immunity of pleomorphic bacteria believed to cause cancer.

The BCG vaccine is used with a treatment program multifocal: vegetarian diet, vitamins, antioxidants, detoxification, nutritional counseling, support groups. Patients followed by tests of immune function and vitamin levels.

However, in 2001 the study of the Centre for Alternative Medicine Research at the University of Texas found the poor performance of the clinic of 191 patients were followed for about half of them had metastatic cancer. Only 28 of 193 patients were found still alive five years later, when the five-year survival rate was 14.5%, no better than conventional therapy with advanced cancer. These results contradict the statements of Livingstone success.

However, other professionals have had better results. Issels Clinic, founded in 1951 in Germany by Dr. Josef Issels, specializing in immunotherapy (with other alternative treatments) and already has a significant success rate documented by independent studies.

Since the end of 1960, the German health insurance covered the treatment Issels Clinic. From 1981 until his retirement in 1987, Dr. Issels served as an expert of the German Government Commission, the fight against cancer.

In clinical trials, Journal (London 1970) peer-reviewed research has shown that the Issels treatment and conventional therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) has improved by a five-year survival rate for patients with metastatic tumors to 87%, compared 50% with standard therapy alone.

In 1959, AG Audier, MD, University of Leiden, the Netherlands, reported that the Issels treatment produces a cure rate of 16.6% in 252 patients with metastatic melanoma, which only has a cure rate at 2% conventional treatments.

This was confirmed by a study conducted in 1971 by John Anderson, MD, of King's College Hospital, which showed a cure rate of 17% for metastatic melanoma. Issels clinic has documented long-term cure (> 10 years) of advanced metastatic cancer, including astrocytomas (malignant tumors of the brain) and melanomas, which are virtually incurable with conventional therapy.

There are two medical clinics in the United States Issels in Phoenix, Arizona, and Santa Barbara, California.

Summary

The proof of a causal link between infection and cancer seems to be overwhelming, but so far there is no universal treatment has been developed with this information.

In some cases, such as intraocular lymphoma, eradication of the infection heals cancer, but in other cases, such as gastric cancer, it has no effect when the disease has evolved from pre- malignant cancer. So far, some success with immunotherapy, but be sure to look for a reputable clinic with proven results, that patient outcomes vary widely among practitioners.

This is certainly an area to watch closely, as new discoveries are made constantly.